Cases 41 - 50 of 330
Grajales-Velasquez v. Garland
as 22-179
Petitioner:
OSIEL GRAJALES-VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Velasquez v. Garland
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 22-71
Petitioner:
MAURICIO VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez-Velasquez v. Garland
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 21-1282
Petitioner:
BERTA LIDIA RAMIREZ-VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ruiz Velasquez v. Garland
as 21-1140
Petitioner:
JOSE ALFREDO RUIZ VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Benjamin Velasquez
as 21-50215
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BENJAMIN VELASQUEZ
Velasquez v. Garland
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 21-469
Petitioner:
ANTELMO VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Velasquez-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 21-403
Petitioner:
VICTORIANO VELASQUEZ-LOPEZ and NELSON RAUL VELASQUEZ-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gomez-Velasquez v. Garland
as 21-326
Petitioner:
RONALD EDUARDO GOMEZ-VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzales-Velasquez v. Garland
as 21-185
Petitioner:
FERNANDO GONZALES-VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Miguel Rivera v. Charles Ryan, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 21-15931
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL SEGO, Mr., facility healthcare administrator, DAVID SHINN, Director, CAMERON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL RIVERA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.