Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 423
Navarro-De Kourany v. Garland
as 22-223
Petitioner: MARLENE NAVARRO-DE KOURANY
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Navarro-Mendez v. Garland
as 22-173
Petitioner: VIDAL NAVARRO-MENDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Navarro-Guardado v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-68
Petitioner: WENDY YESSENIA NAVARRO-GUARDADO and JERSON NEHEMIAS NAVARRO-GUARDADO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gavarrete Navarro v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-65
Petitioner: JAVIER GAVARRETE NAVARRO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Tammy Navarro
as 21-30276
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee: TAMMY JO NAVARRO, AKA Tammy Jo Barker
Navarro-Cordona v. Garland
as 21-1315
Petitioner: BEDER AUGUSTO NAVARRO-CARDONA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Monge Ramirez v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1221
Petitioner: YESENIA ELIZABETH MONGE RAMIREZ, KATHERINE NAYELI DIAZ MONGE, ALCIDES USIEL NAVARRO MONGE and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Stephen Malloy v. City of San Francisco, et al
as 21-16544
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEPHEN MALLOY
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON and others
Stephen Malloy v. Regents of the University, et al
as 21-16535
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEPHEN MALLOY
Defendant / Appellee: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, STEVE BUSTAMANTE, UCOP Chief of Ethics & Compliance Attorney, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON, UCOP Dir. Employee Relations and others
Ricky Foster v. C. Baker, et al
as 21-16326
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICKY TYRONE FOSTER
Defendant / Appellee: C. BAKER and J. NAVARRO, Prison Guard Sergeant at CSP-Corcoran

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?