Cases 51 - 60 of 5,215
Dante Martinez-Lizalde v. William Barr
as 20-56127
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANTE MARTINEZ-LIZALDE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Simon Ortiz Vargas v. David Jennings, et al
as 20-17223
Petitioner:
SIMON ORTIZ VARGAS
Respondent:
CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, DAVID JENNINGS, in his official capacity, San Francisco Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Ana Ruiz Maravilla v. William Barr
as 20-73729
Petitioner:
ANA C. RUIZ MARAVILLA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Reveca Reyes Santos v. William Barr
as 20-73735
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
REVECA REYES SANTOS
Luca Frattini v. William Barr
as 20-73736
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
LUCA MARIA PAULO FRATTINI
J.S.M, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-17204
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, Acting Director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his official capacity, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
J. S. M., et al
Jose Rivera-Caballero v. William Barr
as 20-73728
Petitioner:
JOSE GUADALUPE RIVERA-CABALLERO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Philo Luvengomoka Zumbo v. William Barr
as 20-73731
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
PHILO LUVENGOMOKA ZUMBO
Wilner Joseph v. William Barr
as 20-73732
Petitioner:
WILNER JOSEPH
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Jose Solis-Irias, et al v. William Barr
as 20-73733
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
D.A.S.V., JOSE ALEJANDRO SOLIS-IRIAS, C.A.S.V. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
