Cases 61 - 70 of 566
Segura-Medina v. Garland
as 21-1277
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEL SEGURA-MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gaspar Medina v. Jeff Lynch
as 21-56300
Petitioner / Appellant:
GASPAR MEDINA
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF LYNCH, Acting Warden of CSP-Sacramento
Jacuinde Medina v. Garland
as 21-1191
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO JACUINDE MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
National Produce Trading Company, LLC v. Henderson Foods, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02035
Plaintiff:
National Produce Trading Company, LLC
Defendant:
Henderson Foods, Inc. t/a Tierra Produce, Gilberto Blanco, Salvador Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. ยง 499
USA v. Paola Medina
as 21-50246
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PAOLA MEDINA
Albert Medina v. NDOC, et al
as 21-16606
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT MEDINA
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ELY STATE PRISON WARDEN, D. DRUMMOND and others
Medina Diaz v. Garland
as 21-768
Petitioner:
ARACELI MEDINA DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Maria Medina Tovar, et al v. Laura Zuchowski, et al
as 21-35664
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIA DEL CARMEN MEDINA TOVAR and ADRIAN JOVAN ALONSO MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURA B. ZUCHOWSKI, Director, Vermont Service Center, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Medina-Delgadillo v. Garland
as 21-454
Petitioner:
ADELAIDA MEDINA-DELGADILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
James Soler v. Lisa Wilkins, et al
as 21-55760
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES SOLER
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA WILKINS and RAY HOBBS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
