Cases 71 - 80 of 41,139
International Partners For Ethical Care Inc, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-3661
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS FOR ETHICAL CARE INC, ADVOCATES PROTECTING CHILDREN, PARENT 1A and others
Defendant:
JAY INSLEE, GOVERNOR, ROBERT FERGUSON, Attorney General of Washington and ROSS HUNTER, Secretary of the Washington Department of Children, Youth, and Families
Fresenius Medical Care Orange County, LLC, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-3654
Plaintiff:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE ORANGE COUNTY, LLC, JANE DOE, DA VITA, INC. and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of California, RICARDO LARA, in his Official Capacity as California Insurance Commissioner, MARY WATANABE, in her Official Capacity as Director of the California Department of Managed Health Care and others
Aynayanque Caceres, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3648
Petitioner:
CATHERIM AYNAYANQUE CACERES, VICTOR ARIZAGA DIAZ, YORDY AYNAYANQUE and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Montalvo-Rivera, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3649
Petitioner:
ADA NOEMI MONTALVO-RIVERA and BYRON ARTURO GOMEZ-MONTALVO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez Pedraza v. Garland
as 24-3652
Petitioner:
MANUEL SANCHEZ PEDRAZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Torres Cruz v. Garland
as 24-3653
Petitioner:
CANDELARIO TORRES CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flores v. Garland, et al.
as 24-3656
Plaintiff:
JENNY LISETTE FLORES
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Castillo-Aguilar v. Garland
as 24-3657
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE LEONEL CASTILLO-AGUILAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez-Chua v. Garland
as 24-3658
Petitioner:
DALIA LOPEZ-CHUA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez Morales v. Garland
as 24-3666
Petitioner:
VICTORINO SANCHEZ MORALES, I
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
