Cases 71 - 80 of 309
Harold Edwards v. State of Nevada, et al
as 21-16515
Petitioner / Appellant:
HAROLD EDWARDS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Giles Manley v. Warden, et al
as 21-16401
Petitioner / Appellant:
GILES K.J. MANLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, Director of Nevada Department of Corrections and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Julius Bradford v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 21-16373
Petitioner / Appellant:
JULIUS BRADFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Julius Bradford v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 21-16370
Petitioner / Appellant:
JULIUS BRADFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jose Silva v. Brian Williams, et al
as 21-16365
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE E. SILVA
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Leonard Hill v. Brian Williams, et al
as 21-16361
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEONARD W. HILL
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Anthony Anderson v. State of Nevada 8th District C, et al
as 21-16307
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY K. ANDERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA 8TH DISTRICT COURTS, CHARLES THOMPSON, W. HUTCHINGS and others
Julius Bradford v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 21-16279
Petitioner:
JULIUS BRADFORD
Respondent:
CALVIN JOHNSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Ramon Garcia v. William Hutchings, et al
as 21-16263
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAMON JACOBO GARCIA
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM HUTCHINGS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Edward Garner v. William Hutchings, et al
as 21-16241
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD EUGENE GARNER
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and HAROLD WICKHAM
Respondent:
JAMES COX and TIMOTHY FILSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
