Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 807
Ramos Salazar v. Garland
as 22-83
Petitioner: KENNETH ANDERSON RAMOS SALAZAR
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Aleman-Mendoza v. Garland
as 22-1
Petitioner: DELMI SARAI ALEMAN-MENDOZA and WILDER MISAEL RAMOS-ALEMAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Annice Evans, et al v. Zack Jacobsen, et al
as 21-17073
Plaintiff / Appellee: ANNICE EVANS, individually and as Successor in Interest to Decedent Angel Ramos
Plaintiff: DANTE RAMOS, PHILLIP WILSON-VAUGH, LEANN SANCHEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant: ZACK JACOBSEN
Defendant: CITY OF VALLEJO
Castro Ramos v. Garland
as 21-1190
Petitioner: LUIS ERASMO CASTRO RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos-Chavez v. Garland
as 21-1185
Petitioner: FLORIDALMA RAMOS-CHAVEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos v. Garland
as 21-1033
Petitioner: DELIA EMERY RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos Jeronimo v. Garland
as 21-1016
Petitioner: SANTOS REGINO RAMOS JERONIMO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cassius Whitehead v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 21-16704
Plaintiff / Appellant: CASSIUS CLAYTON WHITEHEAD
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES L. RYAN, ALFRED RAMOS, Warden, JOHN MCADOREY and others
Luis Ramos, et al v. Gerardo Alvarez, et al
as 21-16502
Plaintiff / Appellant: LUIS RAMOS and GUDELIA SANDOVAL
Plaintiff: ALFONSO PADRON, Jr. and ELIDA PADRON
Defendant / Appellee: GERARDO ALVAREZ and PARLIER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant: PARLIER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EDWARD LUCERO, ISRAEL LARA and others
Benjamin Freeman v. State of Arizona, et al
as 21-16390
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF ARIZONA, RUVACOBA, counselor at Manzanita unit, CHARLES L. RYAN, named as Charles Ryan, Director, ADC and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?