Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 41,079
Sorto Morales v. Garland
as 24-3701
Petitioner: CARLOS NORBERTO SORTO MORALES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez-Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3704
Petitioner: JOSE DAVID HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ, EVA SARAI GALO-ROBLES, KEREN NICOLE HERNANDEZ-GALO and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Janvier, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3685
Petitioner: FRANTZCY JANVIER, LOUISINA SAINT-JUSTE and ENZO JANVIER
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Juan-Esteban v. Garland
as 24-3690
Petitioner: MARCOS JUAN-ESTEBAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fresenius Medical Care Orange County, LLC, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-3654
Plaintiff: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE ORANGE COUNTY, LLC, JANE DOE, DA VITA, INC. and others
Defendant: ROB BONTA, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of California, RICARDO LARA, in his Official Capacity as California Insurance Commissioner, MARY WATANABE, in her Official Capacity as Director of the California Department of Managed Health Care and others
Castillo-Aguilar v. Garland
as 24-3657
Petitioner: ENRIQUE LEONEL CASTILLO-AGUILAR
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez Morales v. Garland
as 24-3666
Petitioner: VICTORINO SANCHEZ MORALES, I
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Brown v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 24-3671
Petitioner: MARLON LORENZO BROWN
Respondent: N. BREITENBACH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Martin-Perez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3669
Petitioner: DULCE VERONICA MARTIN-PEREZ and ZOE YAMILET MARTIN-PEREZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hedges v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3687
Plaintiff: CRAIG JOSEPH HEDGES
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID A. HUBBART, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?