Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Goodrum v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-4827
Defendant: NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CARLA BALDWIN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS and others
Plaintiff: MITCHELL KEITH GOODRUM
Volpicelli v. United States Postal Service, et al.
as 24-4656
Defendant: NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Nevada ex rel, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, DON KRAVOS, Postmaster and others
Plaintiff: FERRILL J. VOLPICELLI
Leal v. Adamson, et al.
as 24-4594
Defendant: TERENCE AGUSTIN, MARTIN NAUGHTON, CARLOS CALDERON and others
Plaintiff: JACK LEAL
Centeno v. Grierson, et al.
as 24-4182
Defendant: HDSP LAW LIBRARY, Mailroom Manager, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMILY TORRES and others
Plaintiff: GEROLD CENTENO
Beck v. Sisolak, et al.
as 24-3907
Plaintiff: STANLEY BECK
Defendant: STEVE SISOLAK, CHARLES DANIELS, MICHAEL MINEV and others
Sanders v. Castaneda, et al.
as 24-3904
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY SANDERS
Defendant: CASTANEDA, W. HUTCHING, J. NASH and others
Barren v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-2896
Plaintiff: DONALD ROBIN BARREN
Defendant: THE STATE OF NEVADA EX REL. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TOM LAWSON, P. JORDAN and others
Espinosa v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2466
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN ESPINOSA
Defendant: WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, CHARLES DANIELS, NDOC Director, HAROLD WICKHAM, NDOC Deputy Director FAC #23 and others
Jackson v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1771
Plaintiff: ROBERT JACKSON
Defendant: STATE OF NEVADA, in relation to The Nevada Department of Corrections, E K MCDANIEL, DWIGHT WALTER NEVEN and others
Villanueva v. Daniels, et al.
as 24-647
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSE LUIS VILLANUEVA
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES DANIELS, NDOC Director, MICHAEL MINEV, #9 AC, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?