Cases 1 - 7 of 7
John Ferris, et al v. Wynn Resorts Limited, et al
as 23-80023
Respondent:
JOHN V. FERRIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOANN M. FERRIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and JEFFREY LARSEN
Petitioner:
WYNN RESORTS LIMITED, MATTHEW O. MADDOX, STEPHEN A. WYNN and others
Dustin Gaj v. Stephen Wynn, et al
as 21-15244
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN A. WYNN, MARC D. SCHORR, D. BOONE WAYSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUSTIN GAJ, Derivatively on behalf of Wynn Resorts, Ltd.
Ferris et al v. Wynn Resorts Limited et al
as 2:2018cv00479
Defendant:
Craig Scott Billings, Stephen Cootey, Matthew O. Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
JoAnn M. Ferris and John V. Ferris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Sokolowski v. Wynn et al
as 2:2015cv00536
Defendant:
John J Hagenbuch, Ray R. Irani, Robert J Miller and others
Plaintiff:
W A Sokolowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Louisiana Mun. Police Emp., et al v. Stephen Wynn, et al
as 14-15695
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT J. MILLER, D. BOONE WAYSON, RAY R. IRANI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EXCAVATORS UNION LOCAL 731 WELFARE FUND, MARYANNE SOLAK, BOILERMAKERS LODGE NO. 154 RETIREMENT FUND and others
Boilermakers Lodge No. 154 Retirement Fund v. Wynn et al
as 2:2012cv00555
Plaintiff:
Boilermakers Lodge No. 154 Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Linda Chen, Russell Goldsmith, Ray R. Irani and others
Nominal Defendant:
Wynn Resorts, Limited
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Wynn Resorts, Limited v. Okada et al
as 2:2012cv00400
Counter Claimant:
Aruze USA, Inc. and Universal Entertainment Corporation
Defendant:
Aruze USA, Inc., Kazuo Okada and Universal Entertainment Corporation
Counter Defendant:
Linda Chen, Russell Goldsmith, Ray R Irani and others
Plaintiff:
Wynn Resorts, Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
