Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Sivak v. Fletcher, et al.
as 24-2242
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE and MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Raiser v. Gelmis, et al.
as 24-2163
Plaintiff:
AARON RAISER
Defendant:
SUSAN GELMIS, ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Sivak v. Bennett, et al.
as 24-1351
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE and WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Fletcher, et al.
as 24-1357
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE and MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Fletcher, et al.
as 24-830
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE and MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE
John Demos, Jr. v. USDC-WAWSE
as 23-70132
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr., DANIEL BAYER, Shift Lt, WSP, JENNIFER ADAMS, P.R.E.A. Liason, WSP and others
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Horace Friend, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-35969
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HORACE GOZON FRIEND
Plaintiff:
TERESITA S. FRIEND
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., ROBERT N. KWAN, Hon., U.S. Bankruptcy Court of Southern California and others
William Fletcher v. State of Idaho
as 21-71384
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JERMAINE FLETCHER
Respondent:
STATE OF IDAHO
William Fletcher v. Fourth Judicial District Court, et al
as 21-35923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM JERMAINE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ADA, IDAHO COURT OF APPEALS, CHIEF JUDGE MOLLY HUSKEY and others
William Fletcher v. Idaho Department of Correction, et al
as 21-35128
Defendant / Appellee:
SANDY JONES, IDAHO COMMISSION OF PARDONS AND PAROLE, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM JERMAINE FLETCHER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
