Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,043
Oliver v. St. Andre
as 24-3746
Petitioner: LARRY OLIVER
Respondent: ROB ST. ANDRE, Warden
Clinton v. Pollard, et al.
as 24-3706
Plaintiff: MARKEITH CLINTON
Defendant: M. POLLARD, Warden, R. BUCKEL, Chief Deputy Warden, S. STEADMAN, Associate Warden and others
Hernandez v. Russell, et al.
as 24-3672
Plaintiff: FRANK MANUEL HERNANDEZ
Defendant: PERRY RUSSELL, Warden, RON SCHRECKENGOST, Assistant Warden WSCC, BRIANA HILL, Grievance Report/Assistant and others
Cash v. Peters, et al.
as 24-3615
Petitioner: VINCENT CASH
Respondent: COLETTE PETERS, Director BOP and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD, Warden
Williams v. Pollard, et al.
as 24-3582
Plaintiff: JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS
Defendant: MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, R. BUCKEL, Chief Deputy Warden, O. NAVARRO and others
Ellison v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-3527
Petitioner: CHARLES DAVID ELLISON
Respondent: RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry and JAMES O'NEIL, Warden - Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex
Williams v. Baker, et al.
as 24-3525
Plaintiff: SHANNON WILLIAMS
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER BAKER, PAUL COPENHAVER, Warden, BORJA, Officer and others
Koklich, et al. v. Borders, et al.
as 24-3505
Plaintiff: BRUCE KOKLICH, individually and as Class Representatives, HAROLD W. TAYLOR, DAVID M. ZIEMKE and others
Defendant: DEAN BORDERS, Warden and Senior Administrative and Policy making Officer, individual and official capacity and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, a California Public Entity
Leibel v. Reubart, et al.
as 24-3395
Petitioner: TATIANA LEIBEL
Respondent: REUBART, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Farnum v. LeGrand, et al.
as 24-3316
Petitioner: JOHN MICHAEL FARNUM
Respondent: ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?