Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 80
Tom Hargrove v. Running Warehouse, LLC, et al
as 22-56087
Plaintiff / Appellant: TOM HARGROVE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: RUNNING WAREHOUSE, LLC, a California limited liability company, WILDERNESS SPORTS WAREHOUSE, LLC, a California limited liability company, DBA Tackle Warehouse and SPORTS WAREHOUSE, INC., a California corporation, DBA Tennis Warehouse
Defendant: SKATE WAREHOUSE, LLC, a California limited liability company
J. D. v. Hoyoung Huh, et al
as 22-16694
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: HOYOUNG HUH, NICHOLAS PRITZKER and RIAZ VALANI
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC. and others
In re: J. D. v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-16693
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC and others
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
J. D. v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-16695
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: JUUL LABS, INC.
Defendant: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and others
Evgeniy Goussev, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-35454
Plaintiff / Appellant: EVGENIY GOUSSEV and STACY RITCH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., a California Corporation
Youngsuk Kim v. Benihana, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-55529
Plaintiff / Appellant: YOUNGSUK KIM, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: BENIHANA, INC.
Steven Prescott, et al v. Nestle USA, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-15706
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEVEN PRESCOTT and LINDA CHESLOW, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: NESTLE USA, INC.
Richard Dent, et al v. NFL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-15261
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD DENT, JEREMY NEWBERRY, ROY GREEN and others
Defendant / Appellee: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, a New York unincorporated association
Michael Rubenstein, et al v. Scripps Health
as 22-55186
Not Classified By Court: In re: SCRIPPS HEALTH DATA BREACH LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL RUBENSTEIN, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD MACHADO, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, KATE RASMUZZEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public and others
Defendant / Appellee: SCRIPPS HEALTH
Maxwell Joelson, et al v. USA
as 22-55122
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON, And On Behalf of All others Similarly situated and JUAN VALDEZ, And On Behalf of All others Similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?