Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Doe v. The Roman Catholic Church in the State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2009cv00332
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
The Roman Catholic Church in the State of Hawaii, The Archdiocese of Detroit, The Holy See and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ketchmark v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00131
Plaintiff:
Truman Lee Ketchmark
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Hawaii, City and County of Honolulu and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. State of Hawaii, Department of Transporation - Airports Divsion et al
as 1:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Sandra J. Smith
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Department of Transporation - Airports Divsion, HMS Host Corporation, HMS Host Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ah Mau et al v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2008cv00109
Plaintiff:
Darryl K. Ah Mau, Darryl K. Ah Mau, Darryl K. Ah Mau and others
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Corrections Corporation of America, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Castro v. Pimental et al
as 1:2007cv00558
Plaintiff:
Leah Castro, Leah Castro, Leah Castro and others
Defendant:
Debra Pimental, Ted Choy Foo, State of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. Karr et al
as 1:2007cv00555
Plaintiff:
Tiare Perez
Defendant:
Travis Karr, Melvin Ando, Glenn Yoshimoto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Brown v. Richeliue et al
as 1:2007cv00350
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Brown
Defendant:
Carole R. Richeliue, The Office Of Disciplinary Counsel, State of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Scotto v. CUC International et al
as 1:2007cv00213
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Defendant:
CUC International, Cendent, Doug T. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
