Cases 11 - 20 of 58,221
Lopez Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3799
Petitioner:
INGRID Y LOPEZ RAMIREZ, I, DANIEL E LOPEZ RAMIREZ, I and ANGEL D TELLEZ LOPEZ, I
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Singh, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3801
Petitioner:
SUKHVINDER SINGH, MANDEEP KAUR SINGH and NIRVAER SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Reyes Ortiz v. Garland
as 24-3800
Petitioner:
LUCIA REYES ORTIZ, I
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
People of the State of California, et al. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
as 24-3767
Petitioner:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3765
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, A.R.W., by and through his father Kurt Benshoof, NATHAN CLIBER and others
Leiva Castro, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3761
Petitioner:
FLOR MARINA LEIVA CASTRO, ASHLY GISSEL REYES LEIVA, CRISTIAN JOSUE REYES LEIVA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pereira, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3762
Petitioner:
CLOVIS VAZ PEREIRA, ALINE DOS SANTOS MOROVA VAZ, NOEMI VAZ DOS SANTOS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivera-Trigueros v. Garland
as 24-3764
Petitioner:
DENNIS ORLANDO RIVERA-TRIGUEROS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cordova Carballo v. Garland
as 24-3766
Petitioner:
SANDOR CORDOVA CARBALLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fernandez Quispe, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3769
Petitioner:
YOR YELSIN FERNANDEZ QUISPE and ALIANA YAMILETH FERNANDEZ ALARCON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
