Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Donald Trump, et al v. USDC-WAWSE
as 20-72793
Petitioner:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Not Classified By Court:
CATHRINE SCHMID, PHILLIP STEPHENS, GENDER JUSTICE LEAGUE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Donald Trump, et al v. USDC-WAWSE
as 20-70365
Petitioner:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Not Classified By Court:
CATHRINE SCHMID, PHILLIP STEPHENS, GENDER JUSTICE LEAGUE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Donald Trump, et al v. USDC-WAWSE
as 18-72159
:
In re: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES MATTIS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense and others
Petitioner:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES MATTIS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest:
RYAN KARNOSKI, CATHRINE SCHMID, D.L. and others
Donald Trump, et al v. USDC-WAWSE
as 18-71171
:
In re: DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest:
ABDIQAFAR WAGAFE, MEHDI OSTADHASSAN, HANIN OMAR BENGEZI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
