Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Gregory Johnson, et al v. Clair Couturier, Jr., et al
as 08-17631
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY JOHNSON, WILLIAM RODWELL, EDWARD RANGEL and others
Plaintiff:
DARLEEN STANTON
Witne:
ROORDA PIQUET & BESSEE, INC., Non-party appearing witness
Defendant - Appellant:
CLAIR R. COUTURIER, Jr.
Defendant:
DAVID R. JOHANSON, ROBERT E. EDDY, NOLL MANUFACTURING COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND TRUST and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Secretary
Gregory Johnson, et al v. Clair Couturier, Jr., et al
as 08-17369
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY JOHNSON, WILLIAM RODWELL, EDWARD RANGEL and others
Plaintiff:
DARLEEN STANTON
Witne:
ROORDA PIQUET & BESSEE, INC., Non-party appearing witness
Defendant:
CLAIR R. COUTURIER, Jr., DAVID R. JOHANSON, NOLL MANUFACTURING COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND TRUST and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT E. EDDY
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Secretary
Gregory Johnson, et al v. Clair Couturier, Jr., et al
as 08-17375
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY JOHNSON, WILLIAM RODWELL, EDWARD RANGEL and others
Plaintiff:
DARLEEN STANTON
Witne:
ROORDA PIQUET & BESSEE, INC., Non-party appearing witness
Defendant - Appellant:
CLAIR R. COUTURIER, Jr.
Defendant:
ROBERT E. EDDY, DAVID R. JOHANSON, NOLL MANUFACTURING COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND TRUST and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Secretary
Gregory Johnson, et al v. Clair Couturier, Jr., et al
as 08-17373
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY JOHNSON, WILLIAM RODWELL, EDWARD RANGEL and others
Plaintiff:
DARLEEN STANTON
Witne:
ROORDA PIQUET & BESSEE, INC., Non-party appearing witness
Defendant:
CLAIR R. COUTURIER, Jr., ROBERT E. EDDY, NOLL MANUFACTURING COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND TRUST and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID R. JOHANSON
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Secretary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
