Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Garzon v. American Recovery Service Incorporated of California
as 8:2015cv00801
Plaintiff:
Lisa Garzon
Defendant:
American Recovery Service Incorporated of California
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Owner-Operator Indep, et al v. Landstar System Inc., et al
as 3:2002cv01005
Plaintiff:
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc., G. L. Brewer, Gerald E. Eidam, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Landstar System Inc., Landstar Express America, Inc., Landstar Gemini, Inc and others
Intervenor:
QUALCOMM Incorporated and Comdata Network, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Dominic Caparello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Raper v. Worldmark, The Club Incorporated
as 8:2012cv02591
Plaintiff:
James Raper
Defendant:
Worldmark, The Club Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Palmer v. Adecco Staffing Services, et al
as 8:2012cv00499
Plaintiff:
Marvin Palmer
Defendant:
Adecco Staffing Service, Broadshire Services Incorporated and Instrument Transformer Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. Pink et al
as 2:2011cv00564
Plaintiff:
Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defendant:
Mary Ellen Pink, Matthew J. Jallits, Rachel J. Jallits and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Day v. Persels & Associates, LLC et al
as 8:2010cv02463
Plaintiff:
Miranda L. Day
Defendant:
Persels & Associates, LLC, 3C Incorporated, Freedom Point and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. v. Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. et al
as 8:2009mc00034
Plaintiff:
Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc., Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc., Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc., Abbott Diabetes Care Sales Corp., Bayer Healthcare, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
