Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Fitzpatrick v. Zakheim Law Group, P.A. et al
as 2:2016cv00771
Defendant: Zakheim Law Group, P.A. , Flynn Lavrar and Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Plaintiff: Sara A. Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Eubanks v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 6:2016cv01684
Plaintiff: Alan Eubanks
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Pringle v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 8:2016cv02573
Plaintiff: Amelia Pringle
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
McMinn v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 8:2016cv02581
Plaintiff: Pamela McMinn
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Thomas Morris v. Capital One Bank
as 2:2016cv00685
Plaintiff: Thomas Morris
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Jass v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 6:2016cv01458
Plaintiff: Sally Jass
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
McKinney v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 2:2016cv00560
Plaintiff: Sydney McKinney
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Ledee v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 8:2016cv00996
Plaintiff: Dennis Ledee
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
King v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 8:2016cv00886
Plaintiff: Jennifer King
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reese v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 8:2014cv02463
Plaintiff: Otha Reese
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?