Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Phillips v. Bright House Networks, LLC
as 6:2017cv00252
Plaintiff:
Jason Phillips
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Korda v. Bright House Networks, LLC
as 8:2017cv00262
Plaintiff:
Walt Korda
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Branch v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
as 8:2016cv01764
Plaintiff:
Darcy Branch
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Jones v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 3:2016mc00034
Plaintiff:
Teria Verdell Jones
Defendant:
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and US Bank National Association
Calleja v. Bright House Networks, LLC
as 8:2016cv00991
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Calleja
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Gratsiani v. Desnick et al
as 6:2016cv00595
Plaintiff:
Gideon M.G. Gratsiani
Defendant:
James Desnick , Jordan Desnick , JEG Capital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Hassey v. Bright House Network, LLC
as 6:2016cv00348
Plaintiff:
James Hassey
Defendant:
Bright House Network, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schultz v. Bright House Networks, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv02897
Plaintiff:
Barbara J. Schultz
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC and Credit Protection Association, L.P.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
