Cases 1 - 10 of 367
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Penning v. Global Processing Services, LLC, et al.,
as 3:2024mc00012
Plaintiff:
Matthew Penning
Defendant:
Global Processing Services, LLC, et al.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Pinkans v. Hale et al
as 8:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Pinkans
Defendant:
Matthew B. Hale and Harley E. Riedel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Miller v. Monster Reservations Group, LLC
as 6:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Matthew Miller
Defendant:
Monster Reservations Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Matthews v. Matthews
as 3:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Mr. Benjamin John Matthews and Benjamin John Matthews
Defendant:
Ms. tiffanie Rochelle Dawn matthews and Tiffanie Rochelle Dawn Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Clements v. DeSantis et al
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Louis Matthew Clements
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis and FDLE, MARK GLASS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
State of Florida v. Enright
as 8:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
State of Florida
Defendant:
James Matthew Enright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
State of Florida v. Enright
as 8:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
State of Florida
Defendant:
James Matthew Enright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
