Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gerow v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 8:2022cv02977
Plaintiff:
Eric Gerow
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, City of Phoenix, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01743
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams et al v. Holiday Inn Club Vacations et al
as 6:2020cv00443
Defendant:
Does 1-5, Roe Corporations, 1-10, Holiday Inn Club Vacations and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Rosario, Jantha Williams, Judy Glass and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Batista v. Kavulich & Associates, PC et al
as 2:2018cv00023
Plaintiff:
Rosario Batista
Defendant:
Kavulich & Associates, PC, Gary Kavulich and 2524, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Castro-Rosario v. American Security Insurance Company
as 8:2016cv03053
Plaintiff:
Felix Castro-Rosario
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosario v. Walters et al
as 6:2016cv01492
Plaintiff:
Milca O. Rosario
Defendant:
Barbara Walters and Warner Brothers Studios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Fiallega et al v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2011cv00835
Plaintiff:
Rosario Fiallega and Miguel A. Fiallega
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Homeland Security , Director, Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director, California Service Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
