Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Brooks v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 6:2018cv00554
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shipman v. CP Sanibel, LLC
as 2:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
Rachel H. Shipman
Defendant:
CP Sanibel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thrower et al v. Clayman et al
as 3:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Heidi H, Thrower and Frank Thrower
Defendant:
Loren Z. Clayman, M.D. , Loren Z. Clayman, M.D., P.A. , Allergan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Clayman, M.D. et al
as 3:2018cv00062
Plaintiff:
Crystle H. Brown
Defendant:
Loren Z. Clayman, M.D. , Loren Z. Clayman, M.D., P.A. , Allergan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tripp et al v. New Prime, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02604
Plaintiff:
David E. Tripp and Dianne L. Tripp
Defendant:
New Prime, Inc. and Erwin H. Williams, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bull v. Sam Young Charters, LLC et al
as 6:2017cv01220
Plaintiff:
Robert Bull
Defendant:
Sam Young Charters, LLC and Samuel H. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Browning et al v. Bi-Lo Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00524
Plaintiff:
Joseph H. Browning and Deborah Browning
Defendant:
Bi-Lo Holdings, Inc. , Bi-Lo Holdings, LLC , Bi-Lo Holding, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. McDowell et al
as 3:2016cv01427
Plaintiff:
Shirley A Jones
Defendant:
David A. McDowell and H&S Car Carriers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
S. v. Magical Cruise Company, Limited
as 6:2016cv01895
Plaintiff:
H. S.
Defendant:
Magical Cruise Company, Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Hodges et al v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated et al
as 8:2016cv01742
Plaintiff:
Jaime Lee Hodges , Jason D. Bleistein , Nathan H. Manthey and others
Defendant:
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated and Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
