Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ward et al v. HUVI, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Robert Ward and Dillon Gaston
Defendant:
HUVI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Siegesmund v. Dillon Logistics, Inc.
as 8:2021cv02107
Plaintiff:
Cory Siegesmund
Defendant:
Dillon Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2102
Casequin et al v. Cat 5 Contracting, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00588
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Comer, Cameron Harris, Justin Casequin and others
Defendant:
Matthew Spanton and Cat 5 Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dillon v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, et al
as 8:2018cv00542
Plaintiff:
Frank Dillon
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Mediator:
Mark A. Hanley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perrero et al v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc.
as 6:2016cv02144
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Perrero , Christopher Aelker , Patricia Angel and others
Defendant:
Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dillon v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 8:2015cv02329
Plaintiff:
Theresa Dillon
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dillon v. Air Culinaire Worldwide, LLC
as 8:2015cv00846
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Dillon
Defendant:
Air Culinaire Worldwide, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McNew v. Sutton et al
as 8:2014cv02225
Plaintiff:
Lori McNew
Defendant:
Robert J. Sutton, Christine Dillon and Gulf Coast Plumbing of Central Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dillon v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 8:2010cv00573
Plaintiff:
Charles Dillon
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Dillon v. Mainline Supply of Florida, LLC
as 2:2008cv00933
Plaintiff:
Amy Dillon
Defendant:
Mainline Supply of Florida, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
