Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Maxey v. A.W. Chesterton Co. et al
as 8:2008cv01295
Plaintiff:
Darrell Maxey, Darrell Maxey and Darrell Maxey
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Co., The Anchor Packing Company, Inc., The Anchor Packing Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Austin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 8:2007cv02057
Plaintiff:
Karin M. Austin
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Honeywell International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Miranda v. Lepore et al
as 6:2007cv00283
Plaintiff:
Suely de Castro Alves Miranda and Suely de Castro Alves Miranda
Defendant:
Joseph Lepore, Jan Paul Paladino, Excelaire Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Airline Crash
Wendt, et al v. Dow Chemical Company, et al
as 6:2001cv00680
Defendant:
Exxon Chemical Company Division of Exxon Mobil Corp., Imperial Chemical Industries, Upaco Adhesives, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ona Wendt, Dawn Ackerman, Harold Ackerman and others
Not Classified By Court:
Terrence M. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Ellenburg, et al v. Dow Chemical Co., et al
as 6:2000cv00153
Defendant:
Exxon Chemical Company Division of Exxon Mobil Corp., Imperial Chemical Industries, Upaco Adhesives, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ditmar Wendt, Connie Dickinson, Alma Simpson and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jay M. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Moye, et al v. The Dow Chemical Co., et al
as 6:2000cv00155
Defendant:
Exxon Chemical Company Division of Exxon Mobil Corp., Upaco Adhesives, Inc., Elf-Atofina North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thelma Moye, Luisa Alvarez, Cher Curtis and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jay M. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
