Cases 111 - 120 of 487
ROBERTS v. BAILEY
as 3:2021cv01157
Plaintiff:
LINDA C ROBERTS
Defendant:
WILLIAM F BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PENA et al v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv01094
Plaintiff:
BRENDA PENA and PEDRO PENA
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENKINS et al v. KARPOWICH et al
as 4:2021cv00386
Plaintiff:
WILTON JENKINS and JAMES G BIGGART
Defendant:
STEPHEN KARPOWICH and LISA TRUCKENBROD
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
GIERSBERG v. RICHARDS et al
as 4:2021cv00376
Plaintiff:
Giersberg Christopher and CHRISTOPHER J GIERSBERG
Defendant:
keith Richards Beric, RSB Express, Inc., RSB EXPRESS INC and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Tabitha Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COFIELD v. SAVANNA TRUCKING LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
Ms. Gabriel Cofield and GABRIEL COFIELD
Defendant:
Savanna Trucking, LLC, Mr. Jason Harold Cain, SAVANNA TRUCKING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IVORY v MI-JUNG
as 1:2021cv00118
Plaintiff:
Christopher C Ivory
Defendant:
Kim Mi-Jung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 4:2021cv00240
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL S. HARPER and SAMUEL HARPER
Defendant:
ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Davis and CHARLES G DAVIS
Defendant:
AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEUSER v. PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY W PEUSER
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
TOUSSAINT v. H & E EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC
as 4:2021cv00193
Defendant:
H & E EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY M TOUSSAINT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
