Cases 41 - 48 of 48
COOK v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00607
Plaintiff:
DENISE MICHELLE COOK
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRIGHT v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00513
Plaintiff:
HEATHER MICHELLE BRIGHT
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DENT v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00455
Plaintiff:
MICHELE DENT
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEIR v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MARIE WEIR
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JEMISON v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00886
Plaintiff:
ALICE MICHELLE JEMISON
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCLURE v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MCCLURE
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AKIN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00769
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE AKIN
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER LEE v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00384
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LTD
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MILLER LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
