Cases 31 - 40 of 62
WILLIAMS v. KRISHNA ENTERPRISES OF ALACHUA INC et al
as 1:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
ULAYTHIA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KRISHNA ENTERPRISES OF ALACHUA INC and SANMUKH PATEL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
HARRIS et al v. MICOR COMMUNICATIONS FLA LLC
as 3:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
GREG HARRIS , JUSTIN WILLIAMS , HARRY BRIGMAN and others
Defendant:
MICOR COMMUNICATIONS FLA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TRAMMELL JR v. CLASSY CYCLES INC
as 5:2015cv00013
Defendant:
CLASSY CYCLES INC
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TRAMMELL, JR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BUTTITA et al. v. DIRECTV INC et al.
as 3:2014cv00566
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BUTTITA , SEFTON ANDERSON , CHRISTOPHER BARNHART and others
Defendant:
DIRECTTV INC, DIRECTTV LLC, MASTEC NORTH AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
WOLFE v. WILLIAMS et al
as 3:2014cv00394
Defendant:
WAYNE WILLIAMS and TRI STATE TREE SERVICE LLC
Plaintiff:
JACK WOLFE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MAY v. CREDIBLE SECURITY SERVICES LLC
as 1:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MAY
Defendant:
CREDIBLE SECURITY SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
KELLEY et al v. NITELINES USA, INC.
as 4:2014cv00215
Defendant:
NITELINES USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
DAVID KELLEY , PHYLLIS COVINGTON , DWAYNE HINES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Enforcement of Judgment
LAWRENCE v. KRISHNA INCORPORATION OF NORTH FLORIDA INC et al
as 4:2014cv00197
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE
Defendant:
KRISHNA INCORPORATION OF NORTH FLORIDA INC, PRADIP PATEL and TRUPTI PATEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WILLIAMS v. JCNH INC et al
as 3:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE D WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JCNH INC and JC NICHOLS INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WILLIAM BURGESS v. LHS PENSACOLA #5 INC et al
as 3:2013cv00406
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BURGESS
Defendant:
LHS PENSACOLA #5 INC , JAY PATEL and NARESH PATEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
