Other Labor Litigation Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 101 - 110 of 186
SAADA v. WHATABURGER VENTURES
as 5:2014cv00027
Plaintiff: AMBER SAADA
Defendant: WHATABURGER VENTURES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BIRDSALL v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
as 3:2013cv00637
Plaintiff: TERRINA BIRDSALL
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RANDOLPH v. MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION
as 4:2013cv00595
Defendant: MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY RANDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
COX v. SUNTRUST BANK
as 4:2013cv00518
Plaintiff: BARBARA ANN COX
Defendant: SUNTRUST BANK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
BONIFAY v. EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY
as 3:2013cv00493
Plaintiff: CHARLES BONIFAY
Defendant: EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
MITCHELL v. RAHAL-MILLER CHEVROLET-BUICK INC
as 5:2013cv00239
Plaintiff: AARON MITCHELL
Defendant: RAHAL-MILLER CHEVROLET-BUICK INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Type: Labor Labor: Other
MYERS v. GULF COAST ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC
as 5:2013cv00206
Defendant: GULF COAST ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC
Plaintiff: TRAVIS MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Type: Labor Labor: Other
WILLIS-GREEN v. ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC
as 4:2013cv00258
Plaintiff: LESA WILLIS-GREEN
Defendant: ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Type: Labor Labor: Other
MCFADIN BOYETT v. SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION
as 3:2013cv00152
Plaintiff: KELLI MCFADIN BOYETT
Defendant: SELECT MEDICAL REHABILITATION SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Type: Labor Labor: Other
DAVIS v. CITY OF PERRY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00083
Plaintiff: GLENDA DAVIS
Defendant: CITY OF PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Type: Labor Labor: Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?