Cases 31 - 40 of 227
CAPITAL CITY BANK v. SMITH et al
as 4:2017cv00350
Plaintiff:
CAPITAL CITY BANK
Defendant:
ROBERT V SMITH and JOHN ROGER SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK v. DIAZ
as 5:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK
Defendant:
GLENN E DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC v. BRIDGES et al
as 3:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
Defendant:
DAWN L BRIDGES, RICHARD D BROWN and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US BANK NA v. MATHIS et al
as 3:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
US BANK NA and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
Defendant:
LINDA ANN MATHIS, KATHLEEN MARY RUHLAND and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITNEY BANK v. MAYER et al
as 3:2015cv00471
Plaintiff:
WHITNEY BANK
Defendant:
Stephen M Mayer and Cathy M Mayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
KHODR v. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 4:2015cv00476
Plaintiff:
BILAL KHODR
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. ROBERTSON ANIMAL HOSPITAL, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
ROBERTSON ANIMAL HOSPITAL, LLC , JESSICA A ROBERTSON and WILLIAM M ROBERTSON, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANNA FOOD BANK INC v. WRIGHT NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2015cv00276
Plaintiff:
MANNA FOOD BANK INC
Defendant:
WRIGHT NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
AMERIS BANK v. HENRY et al
as 5:2015cv00136
Plaintiff:
AMERIS BANK
Defendant:
WILLIAM S HENRY and JENNIFER L HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE PROVIDENT BANK v. HYDROTHERAPY VENTURES LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
THE PROVIDENT BANK
Defendant:
HYDROTHERAPY VENTURES LLC, STEPHEN M GAY and SARAH GAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
