Cases 111 - 120 of 2,222
CARIS v. MICHERY
as 1:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
CHOSTEN CARIS
Defendant:
DAVID MICHERY and MULLEN AUTOMOTIVE INC AND BOARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
STATE OF FLORIDA v. MAYORKAS et al
as 3:2023cv09962
Plaintiff:
State of Florida
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Raul Ortiz and United States
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
DOWNEY UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS INC, et al
as 3:2023cv16856
Defendant:
JUUL LABS INC, PAX LABS INC and PLOOM INC, ALTRIA GROUP INC and others
Plaintiff:
DOWNEY UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ALACHUA COUNTY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION et al v. RUBOTTOM et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Alachua County Education Association, UNITED FACULTY OF FLORIDA-UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, UNITED FACULTY OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
DONALD J RUBOTTOM, JEFF AARON and MICHAEL SASSO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv08945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv10194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HINESLEY v. CODEFIED INC
as 3:2023cv13207
Plaintiff:
Jack Hinesley
Defendant:
Codefied Inc. doing business as House Call Pro
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv08032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
