Cases 11 - 20 of 28
MOBLEY et al v. MERCK & CO INC et al
as 3:2018cv01557
Plaintiff:
Grant Mobley, Limon Poppell, Harold Showalter and others
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Merck & Co., Inc., McKesson Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORGAN v. MERCK & CO INC et al
as 3:2018cv01553
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Merck & Co., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Betty Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHEPPARD et al v. MERCK & CO INC et al
as 4:2018cv00200
Plaintiff:
MILDRED SHEPPARD
Defendant:
MERCK & CO INC , MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MCKESSON CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ADAMS v. MERCK & CO INC et al
as 4:2018cv00155
Defendant:
MERCK & CO INC , MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MCKESSON CORP
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HIRAM v. MERCK & CO INC et al
as 1:2018cv00051
Defendant:
MERCK & CO INC , MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MCKESSON CORP
Plaintiff:
CURTIS HIRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GREEN v. MERCK & CO INC et al
as 5:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
DORIS GREEN
Defendant:
MERCK & CO INC , MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MCKESSON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
POAPS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00017
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M POAPS
Defendant:
MERCK & CO INC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PRESLEY et al v. MERCK & CO INC et al
as 1:2009cv00085
Plaintiff:
LARRY PRESLEY, ARLEAS I EWELL, SHIRLEY GIBSON and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WARD v. MERCK & CO INC
as 3:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
MYRA WARD
Defendant:
MERCK & CO INC and MARK GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: Diversity
POWELL v. MERCK & CO INC et al
as 4:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
MELINDA POWELL and MELINDA POWELL
Defendant:
MERCK & CO INC, ROLAND C HENRY and KELLY RAE CARBONA
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
