Cases 31 - 40 of 139
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63505
Plaintiff:
CLYDE ADAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MERRILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62491
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN CLYDE MERRILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COFFEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61542
Plaintiff:
CLYDE COFFEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ISOM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59225
Plaintiff:
CLYDE ISOM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTSON v. AEARO HOLDING LLC et al
as 7:2021cv56322
Plaintiff:
CLYDE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55625
Plaintiff:
CLYDE LEROY RAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REFFITT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46053
Plaintiff:
BRANTLY COLTON CLYDE REFFITT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUDGINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv45200
Plaintiff:
CLYDE HUDGINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHEREN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43669
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CLYDE SHEREN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCKASKLE JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43231
Plaintiff:
CLYDE W MCKASKLE JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
