Cases 31 - 40 of 159
JOHNSON et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICES
as 4:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Daryl Jerome Johnson and Dominique Nekia Davis
Defendant:
United States Postal Services and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA d/b/a UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
RIVERA v. TOKAJER et al
as 3:2022cv04921
Plaintiff:
JESUS RIVERA
Defendant:
ANDREW S. TOKAJER, ALEX CHAN, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
TUCKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
STANLEY TUCKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
PONDER v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Quintell Ponder
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
GILES et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Florida Robert Howard Giles, Brenda Giles and ROBERT GILES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
HAMILTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2021cv00216
Plaintiff:
Sebrena Hamilton
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
LEIDHOLDT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2021cv01213
Plaintiff:
RENEE M LEIDHOLDT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
COURTEMANCHE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
DANIEL COURTEMANCHE and DOROTHY COURTEMANCHE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
DARHOWER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2021cv00910
Plaintiff:
Florida Stacey Darhower and STACEY DARHOWER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
KATZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2021cv00254
Plaintiff:
Rosa Katz
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
