Cases 11 - 20 of 24
HENSELER v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 3:2015cv00321
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE HENSELER
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SIMPLER v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 3:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
ANJANETTE SIMPLER
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
EZEKIEL v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 5:2014cv00244
Plaintiff:
CHRISTY EZEKIEL
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
REESE v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00172
Plaintiff:
STEVEN REESE
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BUSBY v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 3:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
TERESA A BUSBY
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
FORSYTH v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 3:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN L FORSYTH
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SNOWDEN et al v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
TREVINO SNOWDEN and CHARLENE SNOWDEN
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and RUTH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. SISK
as 4:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PAUL SISK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
CODY v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 3:2010cv00414
Plaintiff:
CHERYL ANN CODY
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
EARLY AYCOCK v. BEALL'S INC. et al
as 3:2010cv00301
Plaintiff:
LAURIE EARLY AYCOCK
Defendant:
BEALL'S INC., BEALLS INC. PLAN and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
