Cases 1 - 10 of 13
THRASH et al v. TADLOCK ROOFING INC
as 4:2019cv00038
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW THRASH, MARC EARNEST, NICHOLAS HICKEY and others
Defendant:
TADLOCK ROOFING, INC. and TADLOCK ROOFING INC
DIONNE v. H&H ANTIQUES LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00307
Plaintiff:
Rachel Dionne
Defendant:
H&H Antiques LLC d/b/a H&H Furniture and Design, William Thro, John Matthew Thro and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ROBERSON v. FIBCO INC et al
as 5:2018cv00113
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ROBERSON
Defendant:
FIBCO INC and DONALD BRADDY, JR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HARPER v. IRON RESTAURANT GROUP LLC et al.
as 3:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HARPER
Defendant:
IRON RESTAURANT GROUP LLC and MIKE BRAZWELL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
PYZIK v. GUARDIAN LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PYZIK
Defendant:
GUARDIAN LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
BURGESS v. MIDWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES INC et al
as 3:2012cv00494
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BURGESS
Defendant:
MIDWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES INC, GLOBAL EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC, GOLDEN PROFESSIONAL SOLUTIONS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BLAKE v. HUNTER GARDNER INC et al
as 4:2012cv00395
Plaintiff:
QUENTIN BLAKE
Defendant:
HUNTER GARDNER INC , ADAM WELLS and MATTHEW WELLS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PRESTON et al v. AUTO NETWORK INC et al
as 3:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY PRESTON and MATTHEW ROGERS
Defendant:
AUTO NETWORK INC and MEDHI MIKHCHI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
FRANCISCO v. AARON'S SALES & LEASE OWNERSHIP INC
as 1:2012cv00077
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW FRANCISCO
Defendant:
AARON'S SALES & LEASE OWNERSHIP INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
OFFENBACHER v. ROCK OF GAINESVILLE INC
as 1:2011cv00159
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW OFFENBACHER
Defendant:
ROCK OF GAINESVILLE INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
