Cases 11 - 20 of 23
BARFIELD et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 5:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
NELLIE J BARFIELD and JOHN H BARFIELD
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 4:2011cv00172
Plaintiff:
ARLENE E MOON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION , GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC, GLAXO WELLCOME UK LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, et al.,
as 4:2011cv00115
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA ANN JOHNSON and LEON JOHNSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BERMUDEZ v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 4:2011cv00077
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
CARIDAD BERMUDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HENDERSON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 4:2010cv00551
Plaintiff:
CARISSA HENDERSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 5:2010cv00230
Plaintiff:
TAMMY WHITE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CREEL v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 3:2009cv00154
Plaintiff:
GREGORY CREEL
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BIFFLE et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
HERSHEL BIFFLE and FELECIA BIFFLE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE LLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE LP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RIVERS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 3:2008cv00414
Plaintiff:
LEROY RIVERS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GOODRICH v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 5:2008cv00277
Plaintiff:
JAMES GOODRICH
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
