Cases 41 - 49 of 49
WHITE v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2009cv00006
Plaintiff:
REBECCA WHITE
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FERGUSON v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2008cv00560
Plaintiff:
JACK M FERGUSON, JR
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SEEDORF v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2008cv00452
Plaintiff:
DAVID SEEDORF
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NICHELSON v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2008cv00079
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH NICHELSON
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BULLIS v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2007cv00226
Plaintiff:
TINA BULLIS
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
HILL v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 4:2007cv00312
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HILL
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
ENGLISH v. THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2007cv00096
Plaintiff:
EDDY M ENGLISH and EDDY M ENGLISH
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
JONES v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2007cv00033
Plaintiff:
JUDY L JONES
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
RONGSTAD v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2007cv00009
Plaintiff:
DEBRA RONGSTAD
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
