Cases 1 - 9 of 9
GAY v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC
as 5:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
JOHN GAY and TERRY GAY
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
GAY et al v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC.
as 5:2021cv00247
Plaintiff:
JOHN GAY and TERRY GAY
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
GAY et al v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC.
as 5:2021cv00248
Plaintiff:
JOHN GAY and TERRY GAY
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SMITH v. GULF WINDS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 3:2011cv00398
Plaintiff:
DALE R SMITH
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
NORTH OKALOOSA MEDICAL CENTER v. WILKINSON
as 3:2011cv00309
Plaintiff:
NORTH OKALOOSA MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
ANNE M WILKINSON
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
ANNE M WILKINSON
Thirdparty_defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
WILLIAMS v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC
as 3:2009cv00225
Plaintiff:
JOHN S WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
AMSLER v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC
as 1:2008cv00179
Plaintiff:
Karen Amsler
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TURNER v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC
as 3:2008cv00248
Plaintiff:
MOLLY TURNER
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
DONALDSON v BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC
as 3:2008cv00221
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE DONALDSON
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INC and NATIONAL IMAGING ASSOCIATES INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
