Cases 1 - 8 of 8
UMG RECORDINGS INC et al v. DOE 1
as 1:2007cv00211
Plaintiff:
UMG RECORDINGS INC, ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, WARNER BROS RECORDS INC and others
Defendant:
DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION et al v. NUVOLI
as 3:2007cv00123
Plaintiff:
ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, CAPITOL RECORDS INC, MOTOWN RECORD COMPANY LP and others
Defendant:
STEPHANIE NUVOLI
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION et al v. MOWBRAY
as 3:2007cv00089
Plaintiff:
ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC, WARNER BROS RECORDS INC and others
Defendant:
TIFFANY MOWBRAY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
WARNER BROS RECORDS INC et al v. DAVIDSON
as 3:2007cv00088
Plaintiff:
WARNER BROS RECORDS INC, CAPITOL RECORDS INC, VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA INC and others
Defendant:
DAWN DAVIDSON
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC et al v. LYONS
as 3:2007cv00070
Plaintiff:
ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC, ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, BMG MUSIC and others
Defendant:
CHARLES LYONS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
WARNER BROS RECORDS INC et al v. O'NEAL
as 3:2007cv00035
Plaintiff:
WARNER BROS RECORDS INC, MAVERICK RECORDING COMPANY, CAPITOL RECORDS INC and others
Defendant:
GAIL O'NEAL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
CAPITOL RECORDS INC et al v. MARTINEZ
as 3:2007cv00036
Plaintiff:
CAPITOL RECORDS INC, UMG RECORDINGS INC, SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT and others
Defendant:
ANNA MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
CAPITOL RECORDS INC et al v. NORRIS
as 3:2007cv00001
Plaintiff:
CAPITOL RECORDS INC, UMG RECORDINGS INC, ARISTA RECORDS LLC and others
Defendant:
MARK NORRIS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
