Cases 1 - 10 of 34
MATTHEWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17052
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTHEWS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TRAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12688
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTHEW TRAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAYMOND v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02520
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTHEW RAYMOND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
LUCAS JOHN MATTHEW THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NEVILLE v. BLUEGRASS LENDING GROUP INC
as 3:2023cv18088
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTHEW NEVILLE
Defendant:
BLUEGRASS LENDING GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
NEVILLE v. TRU CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
as 3:2023cv17555
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTHEW NEVILLE
Defendant:
TRU CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
HAIGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11065
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTHEW HAIGHT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURNS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24286
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTHEW BURNS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FORTNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07464
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTHEW FORTNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ERICKSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03237
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTHEW ERICKSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
