Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Carrero v. Norfolk, LLP. et al
as 0:2023cv60689
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Carrero
Defendant:
Norfolk, LLP. doing business as Royal Garden Village and Stephen Henry Schneider
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Culbertson v. The Kings Academy
as 9:2022cv80009
Plaintiff:
Stephen Culbertson
Defendant:
The Kings Academy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Olejniczak v. Speed Fanatix, Inc. et al
as 9:2021cv82002
Plaintiff:
Simmon Olejniczak
Defendant:
Speed Fanatix, Inc., Stephen Harper and Reg Dodd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Crejuste v. Fit Food Fresh, Inc. et al
as 9:2021cv80372
Plaintiff:
Ronel Crejuste and Francky Duclervil
Defendant:
Fit Food Fresh, Inc. and Stephen Kaiser
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704
Crejuste v. Fit Food Fresh, Inc. et al
as 9:2021cv80169
Plaintiff:
Ronel Crejuste
Defendant:
Fit Food Fresh, Inc. and Stephen Kaiser
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704
Miller v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. et al
as 2:2020cv14130
Plaintiff:
Michelle Miller
Defendant:
Stephen R. Hedrick and Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
WILSON v. BIG STEVES DELI LLC et al
as 0:2020cv60381
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH E. WILSON
Defendant:
STEPHEN VALENTI and BIG STEVES DELI LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
GUZMAN MILA v. BIG STEVES DELI LLC et al
as 0:2020cv60367
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. GUZMAN MILA
Defendant:
STEPHEN VALENTI and BIG STEVES DELI LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Bork v. All Dade Plumbing, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv62542
Defendant:
Daniel Boyer, Kenneth Dean Richter, II and All Dade Plumbing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stephen Bork
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
BUZZELL, JR. v. FLORIDA KEYS AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC. et al
as 4:2019cv10190
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUZZELL, JR.
Defendant:
FLORIDA KEYS AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC. and EDWARD BONILLA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
