Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Locke v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
as 1:2010cv23957
Plaintiff:
Nelson A. Locke
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Nelson v. Deerfield Empire, L.L.C.
as 0:2010cv61814
Plaintiff:
Edward Nelson
Defendant:
Deerfield Empire, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Fillichio v. Nelson, Watson & Associates, LLC.
as 0:2010cv60543
Plaintiff:
Sandra W. Fillichio
Defendant:
Nelson, Watson & Associates, LLC.
Mediator:
Samuel L Heller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nelson v. Deerfield Empire, LLC
as 0:2009cv61814
Plaintiff:
Edward Nelson
Defendant:
Deerfield Empire, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Steffen v. Kline et al
as 1:2009cv20818
Plaintiff:
Terri L. Steffen
Defendant:
Kevin F. Kline, Kline, Moore & Klein, Professional Association, Ernest B. Haire, III and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Michailiuk v. Nelson, Watson & Associates, LLC
as 0:2008cv61612
Plaintiff:
George Michailiuk
Defendant:
Nelson, Watson & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Francois v. Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv21442
Plaintiff:
Nelson Francois
Defendant:
Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc., Angelica Martinez, R.N., Tenet Healthsystem North Shore, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Does et al v. Chiquita Brands International, Inc. et al
as 9:2008cv80480
Plaintiff:
Juan Does, Juana Does, Luz Lopez Sierra and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Individuals "A through J", Moe Corporations and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Valencia v. Nelson, Watson & Associates, LLC
as 0:2007cv61088
Plaintiff:
Nancy M. Valencia
Defendant:
Nelson, Watson & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
