Cases 61 - 70 of 361
Landau et al v. Landau et al
as 1:2022cv23322
Plaintiff:
Robin Landau and Cheri Oquist
Defendant:
Eric Landau, Jeffrey Detwiler and John J. Lefkus
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to confirm arbitration award
X Delivery OL, LLC v. AHW Global, LLC
as 0:2022cv61413
Petitioner:
X Delivery OL, LLC and OneLive, LLC
Respondent:
AHW Global, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to confirm arbitration award
WENZEL v. VANDUTCH, INC.
as 0:2022cv61338
Petitioner:
Todd Wenzel
Respondent:
VANDUTCH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to confirm arbitration award
Seested, III v. Schultz et al
as 9:2022cv81047
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Victor Seested, III
Defendant:
Frederick Joseph Schultz, Eric Jordan Teichberg and Howard Stuart Rothman
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to confirm arbitration award
Lloyd v. Frederick et al
as 1:2022cv22191
Petitioner:
Seested Lloyd
Respondent:
Schultz Frederick, Eric Teichberg and Howard Rothman
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to confirm arbitration award
American Enterprise Investment Services, Inc. et al v. Silverman et al
as 1:2021cv23044
Petitioner:
American Enterprise Investment Services, Inc. and Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC
Respondent:
Miriam Silverman and Miriam Silverman Living Trust
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Bluequest Resources, AG v. Venalloys LLC
as 1:2022cv22045
Plaintiff:
Bluequest Resources, AG
Defendant:
Venalloys LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Seested, III v. Schultz et al
as 1:2022cv22192
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Victor Seested, III
Defendant:
Frederick Joseph Schultz, Eric Jordan Teichberg and Howard Stuart Rothman
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to confirm arbitration award
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney,LLC, et al v. Shefer
as 1:2022cv21542
Plaintiff:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Financing LLC
Defendant:
Izhar Shefer
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to confirm arbitration award
Umwelt- und Ingenieurtechnik GmbH v. Prolific Mining Corp.
as 1:2022cv21808
Petitioner:
Umwelt- und Ingenieurtechnik GmbH
Respondent:
Prolific Mining Corp.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to confirm arbitration award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
