Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rendon Acero et al v. USCIS et al
as 9:2024cv80480
Plaintiff:
Carolina Rendon Acero, Manuela Estrada Rendon, Mateo Estrada Rendon and others
Defendant:
USCIS, SECRETARY Alejandro MAYORKAS, Attorney Gen. MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Judge et al v. Judge et al
as 1:2022cv24232
Plaintiff:
Marina Judge, Olivia Judge, Daniel Thomas Judge and others
Defendant:
James Francisco Judge and Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Judge et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
as 1:2022cv24233
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Judge, Juliana Cristina Judge, Daniel Enrique Judge and others
Defendant:
Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou and United States Citizenship & Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Martinelli-Berrocal v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv23511
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Alberto Martinelli-Berrocal
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Antony John Blinken and Thomas B Heinemann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Sproule v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al
as 9:2017cv80709
Plaintiff:
Justin Sproule
Defendant:
United States Food and Drug Administration , United States Department of Health and Human Services and Thomas E Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Med-Care Diabetic and Medical Supplies, Inc. v. Price
as 9:2017cv80578
Plaintiff:
Med-Care Diabetic and Medical Supplies, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas E Price
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Dombrowski et al v. Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 9:2016cv81665
Plaintiff:
Michael David Dombrowski, James Scianno, Keith Engelhardt and others
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0841
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
