Cases 11 - 19 of 19
ARRINGTON v. BURGER KING WORLDWIDE, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv24128
Defendant:
BURGER KING CORPORATION and BURGER KING WORLDWIDE, INC.
Plaintiff:
JARVIS ARRINGTON
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Monique Michel, Sandra Munster, Geneva Blanchard and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Restaurant Brands International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Federal Trade Commission v. Diversified Educational Resources, LLC et al
as 0:2014cv62116
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Diversified Educational Resources, LLC, Motivational Management & Development Services, LTD., IDM Services LLC and others
Mediator:
Eunice Baros
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Jackson v. PNC Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv14329
Plaintiff:
Douglas-Marshall: Jackson
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A., Sylvan M. Holzer, James B. Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Thorne v. Global Credit & Collection Corporation
as 1:2011cv23258
Plaintiff:
Tiffany N. Thorne
Defendant:
Global Credit & Collection Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Thorne v. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv22290
Plaintiff:
Tiffany N. Thorne
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Management, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv21448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Thorne v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2010cv20589
Plaintiff:
Tiffany N. Thorne
Defendant:
Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Thorne v. Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
as 1:2010cv20257
Plaintiff:
Tiffany N. Thorne
Defendant:
Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith v. Academy Collection Service, Inc.
as 1:2008cv20687
Plaintiff:
Tiffany T. Smith
Defendant:
Academy Collection Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
