Cases 11 - 20 of 518
In the Matter of the Extradition of Renzo Hiklis Rangel Prentt
as 9:2024mc80209
Not Yet Classified:
Renzo Hiklis Rangel Prentt
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3181 Extradition to Foreign Country
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Perez v. Santander Consumer USA et al
as 1:2024cv20017
Plaintiff:
Gaddiel David Perez
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA and Chrysler Capital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 0:2023mc62400
Plaintiff:
William Rose
Defendant:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG, LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Prosegur Security USA, Inc. v. Global Elite Group, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv62176
Plaintiff:
Prosegur Security USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Global Elite Group, Inc. and Steve Lindo
Prosegur Security USA, Inc. v. Global Elite Group, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv62171
Plaintiff:
Prosegur Security USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Global Elite Group, Inc. and Steve Lindo
Mederos v. Powersol USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv24228
Plaintiff:
Pedro Mederos
Defendant:
Powersol USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Universal Protection Service, LLC v. Prosegur Security USA et al
as 1:2023cv23818
Plaintiff:
Universal Protection Service, LLC doing business as ALLIED UNIVERSAL
Defendant:
Prosegur Security USA, Adam Shapiro and Wendy Witlow
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
