Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv82550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
The Coring Company v. Apple Inc et al
as 9:2021cv82235
Plaintiff:
The Coring Company
Defendant:
Apple Inc and Mr. Tim Cook
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Kazmierczak v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 2:2021cv14092
Defendant:
Dr. Benjamin, Environmental Protection Agency, Atlanta Journal Constitution and others
Plaintiff:
Jacek Kazmierczak
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Guthrie v. US Government et al
as 9:2017cv80390
Plaintiff:
Randolph H. Guthrie, III
Defendant:
US Government, Apple, Inc., AT&T Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
LEDEZMA DIAZ v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2016mc21811
Petitioner:
ANTONIO LEDEZMA DIAZ
Respondent:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv23630
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv23627
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Guthrie v. US Government et al
as 1:2012cv22193
Plaintiff:
Randolph H. Guthrie, III
Defendant:
US Government, City of New York, City of Miami, FL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Psystar Corporation v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2009cv22535
Plaintiff:
Psystar Corporation and Psystar Corporation
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
