Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv81521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv81123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Empires Consulting Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv21995
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Empires Consulting Corp. doing business as EmpiresX, Emerson Sousa Pires, Flavio Mendes Goncalves and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Empires Consulting Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv21997
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Empires Consulting Corp., Emerson Pires, Flavio Goncalves and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0009 Commodity Futures Trading Act
Robinson v. Section 23 Property Owner's Association, Inc., A Florida Corporation
as 2:2016cv14127
Plaintiff:
Albert Robinson
Defendant:
Section 23 Property Owner's Association, Inc., A Florida Corporation, Rico, Keathel Chauncey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Emerson et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2014cv21713
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Emerson , Melinda Barbiaux , Carter Brown Davis and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC , Delphi Automotive PLC and Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Callahan et al v Anton et al
as 0:2008cv60887
Plaintiff:
Emerson D. Callahan, Joel W. Hurd, Allen Wagner and others
Defendant:
Mark Anton, Sherri Paisley, Ian Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
