Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ATKINS v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD.
as 1:2024cv20325
Plaintiff:
TRESA ATKINS
Defendant:
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD. doing business as ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Atkins v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv22052
Plaintiff:
Lisa Atkins
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chattem, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Atkins v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv20985
Plaintiff:
Lisa Atkins
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chattem, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Atkins v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv19816
Plaintiff:
Jeff Atkins
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dingler-Atkins v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv19457
Plaintiff:
Denise Dingler-Atkins
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Atkins v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2022cv81783
Plaintiff:
Ghia Atkins
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithkline PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv24790
Plaintiff:
Brinda Bradley, Kevin D. White, Deatirce Digman and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pera et al v. Atkins-Hanschen, Inc.
as 1:2015cv21284
Defendant:
Atkins-Hanschen, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Janet Pera and Daniella Uribe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
